WALTSTAR
Well-Known Member
JUST MY OPINION, BUT YOU KNOW, THE MAJORITY OF LAWS ARE CREATED TO "PROTECT" THE PUBLIC FROM THEMSELVES. WITHOUT DEBATING THE VALIDITY, I DO THINK THAT THE HELMET SHOULD BE A PIECE OF LAWFUL REQUIRED EQUIPMENT. IF SOMEONE CHOOSES TO EXERCISE THIER FREEDOM BY NOT WEARING A HELMET AND THEY SUBSEQUENTLY GET A PIECE OF GRAVEL OR A LARGE INSECT IN THE FACE/EYE AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS, I GUESS THATS THE PRICE TO PAY FOR FREEDOM, RIGHT? ALTHOUGH YOU COULD LOSE CONTROL AND HAVE A ACCIDENT THAT DOES NOT KILL YOU FROM SAID GRAVEL OR INSECT, A BRAIN-DAMAGING ACCIDENT IS STILL WORTH THE "FREEDOM" RIGHT? I WOULD HATE TO HAVE TO RESORT TO GOING TO THE CLUBHOUSE LOOKING LIKE THE ELEPHANT MAN BECAUSE I CANT RIDE ANYMORE SIMPLY BECAUSE I WAS "MAN" ENOUGH TO EXERCISE MY FREEDOM. LETS KEEP IT REAL HERE, BUT YOU CAN GET KILLED BY EVEN DOING EVERYTHING RIGHT AND BEING SAFE BECAUSE OF THE UNKNOWNS ON THE ROAD. WHY CREATE A OPENING FOR ANOTHER POTENTIAL FATAL CONCERN? I WOULD RATHER BE A "SISSY" THAT SURVIVED TO RIDE AGAIN THAN A DEAD OR PERMANANTLY DISABLED "TOUGH GUY". I ALWAYS WEAR A FULL HELMET WITH A FACE SHIELD. STAY AWAY FROM BEANIE HELMETS. THEY OFFER NO PROTECTION FROM ANYTHING MORE THAN BIRD DROPPINGS...


No really, I have 3 young sons and a wife that I would rather not die on, or leave to take care of a veggie. I figure road rash/broken bones will heal, but the brain doesn't come back so easy.